Showing posts with label Research - Bad Sources. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Research - Bad Sources. Show all posts

Saturday, June 21, 2014

Don't use zip codes for sales tax rate lookups

United States Mail Railway Post Office

Don't use zip codes for sales tax rate lookups.

Happily, at lease two of the rate lookup services use the actual street address. This is the best way, short of the actual GPS coordinates.  But zip codes? Alas, there are couple of sites that use zip codes for look-ups.

Here's an example.  I looked up the rate for my zip code of 60510.  The problem is that there are locations in 60510 that are NOT within the boundaries of the city of Batavia.  So the rate provided isn't accurate unless the "looker-upper" knows that the particular location is inside or outside the city limits. However, using the actual address will give you the accurate information you need.  But the zip code won't work.

As an aside, one particular site says that freight charges aren't taxable. Hmmmm (drumming fingers)...in fact, they ARE taxable in Illinois, depending on several conditions.

Remember that zip codes have no relationship to taxing districts.  The purpose of zip codes was to speed the delivery of catalogs and flyers to your house.  I forgot the name of the organization that does that...they drive little white trucks.  Dang, can't remember the name.  Anyway, zip codes were not intended, nor are they usable, as an accurate means for determining political subdivisions.  And sales taxes are all about political subdivisions.



The Sales Tax Guy http://salestaxguy.blogspot.com

See the disclaimer on the right.

Don't forget our upcoming seminars and webinars. http://www.salestax-usetax.com and there's more sales tax news and links here http://salestaxnews.blogspot.com

Picture note: the image above is hosted on Flickr. If you'd like to see more, click on the photo.

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

In which I sweep up more than just janitorial services in a discussion about online resources



See what I did there....

This inquiry was received recently.  It's a pretty frequently asked question so I thought I'd take a stab at it again. 

"Do you have any articles that deal with the taxability of janitorial services for all states?"

Nope, I don't have anything like that and wouldn't publish it anyway.  I don't typically write articles with that level of minute detail.  That's what online databases are for.  I use Thomson Reuters* as my research tool (although CCH has the information as well), and I can research janitorial services for any state in a matter of moments.  Well....maybe not "moments" if there are some interesting complications.

Even if you could find such an article somewhere on a free web site, you probably can't count on it unless you're paying for it.  Let's say you find a page where someone has put together a table about the taxation of janitorial services for every state.  

My questions would be: 
  1. How often is it updated?
  2. Are there citations to specific statutes, regulations and court cases?
  3. Is the information in the list detailed enough to cover the possible exceptions and gotchas...like the interesting complications I mentioned above?
You're probably going to have to pay for that kind of reliability.

When we do a state-specific seminar, we re-research the state every time.  We don't just rely on the material we have from the last event.  We review our grid on what is taxable or not, change things where necessary, and review any updates to the sales and use tax laws since the last time we did a seminar for that state.  So when we do the seminar, we can feel comfortable that we're using the latest information.  That's one of the reasons why we don't provide recordings of these seminars.  We don't want people relying on information that can so easily go out of date.

On the other hand, I frequently find articles written by attorneys and accountants to be useful.  They are usually handy for covering a topic that isn't covered as well as I'd like on either the state's web page, or in the databases.  But they are detailed, dated and usually well-cited.  But I still have my salt-shaker nearby.

*By the way, I'm not endorsing Thomson Reuters.  Inertia keeps me using their service.  Although sometimes I wistfully think it might be more fun with CCH.   



The Sales Tax Guy
http://salestaxguy.blogspot.com

See the disclaimer on the right.

Don't forget our upcoming seminars and webinars.
http://www.salestax-usetax.com
and there's more sales tax news and links here http://salestaxnews.blogspot.com

Picture note: the image above is hosted on Flickr. If you'd like to see more, click on the photo. 



Thursday, May 17, 2012

FAQ: "Do you have any articles that deal with the taxability of ____ for all states?"

Garbage CansThis inquiry was received today.  It's a pretty frequently asked question so I thought I'd take a stab at it again.

"Do you have any articles that deal with the taxability of janitorial services for all states?"

Actually, I do have pretty detailed notes (my cheat sheet) on this for every state, but I wouldn't publish it.  I don't typically write articles with that level of state-specific detail.  But the databases have that info.  I use RIA as my research tool (although CCH has the information as well) and I can research and update my notes on janitorial services for any state in a matter of moments.  Frankly, if you need that kind of information for all the states on a frequent basis, you should subscribe to one of the databases. 

Even if you were to find such an article, you can't count on it unless, frankly, you're paying for it.  Let's say you find a web site where you can get the information for free - someone put together a table of janitorial services taxation for every state.  My questions would be: how is it updated, are there citations to specific statutes and regulations, and is the information in the table detailed enough to cover the possible exceptions and gotchas?  You're probably going to have to pay for that kind of reliability.

When I do a state-specific seminar, I re-research the state every time.  I don't just rely on my cheat sheet from the last time.  I review it for what is taxable or not, change things where necessary,  and review any updates to the sales and use tax laws since the last time I did a seminar for that state.  So when I do the seminar, I can feel comfortable that I'm using the latest info.  That's one of the reasons why I don't provide recordings of these seminars.  I don't want people relying on information that can so easily go out of date.  And a table or article from a free web site is likely to be not very detailed and easily out of date.

Which is why I don't typically provide that level of detail unless I've got specific warnings that the information is illustrative and is probably out of date.

So don't rely on tables or cheap information.  Use good research tools

Sorry, I must be off today.  No jokes.  Dang.



The Sales Tax Guy
http://salestaxguy.blogspot.com

See the disclaimer - this is for education only.  Research these issues thoroughly before making decisions.  Remember: there are details that haven't been discussed, and every state is different.  Here's more information

Get these articles in your inbox - subscribe at http://salestaxguy.blogspot.com

Don't forget our upcoming seminars and webinars.
http://www.salestax-usetax.com/
Picture note: any images above are hosted on Flickr. If you'd like to see more, click on the photo. 

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Your taxes at work or why you shouldn't assume the auditor knows what they're talking about.

Illinois State CapitolI was doing a seminar in the Capital of East Dakota a few years ago.

When I walked into the meeting room a couple of hours before the event, I was surprised by the number of participants that were on the roster. Usually, in a city the size of Snagglepuss (the capital of East Dakota, as if you didn't know), I would have expected about 20 to 30 people. But the list showed almost 80 folks. This was pretty close to a record for me. I've only seen crowds of that size in Manhattan. And this wasn't Manhattan. Not even close.

I took a look at the roster again to see if I could find any reason for the big numbers and immediately spotted the cause. Almost 50 people were from one organization...the East Dakota Department of Revenue.

I groaned. It's never a good thing when someone from the tax department is at one of my seminars. It's not that they interfere. In fact, they are usually complimentary about the program. What drives me nuts is that everyone else in the seminar shuts up. There's virtually no interactivity, no questions, no comments...nothing! After all, who is going to ask a question about their sales tax issues when there's an auditor sitting in the front row? And the auditor isn't going to ask any questions - they don't want to look like they don't know about sales tax. So it turns into a really boring seminar for the audience.

In this case, I had not just one auditor, which is bad enough. I had 50 of them, far outnumbering the civilians in the room. It did not promise to be a good day.

And it didn't inspire confidence in the East Dakota Department of Revenue either. As a seminar presenter, you can tell if your audience is getting the material you're presenting. You see smiles of comprehension, knowing nods, and people ask questions to clarify points as opposed to "Can you explain use tax again?" In this class, I was looking out on close to 50 people who were clearly lost. There were a lot of dull stares coming from the auditor part of audience. Their lack of understanding was confirmed by the questions they were asking at the breaks. I felt like saying, "Wait a minute, you guys are sales tax auditors?"

You may be wondering how the civilian part of the audience was doing. I saw nothing but pure terror on their faces. And they kept making sidelong glances at the auditors that were sitting among them.  Also interesting was how many of them had taken off their name badges.

During one of the breaks, I was chatting with one of the few auditors who I could see was getting the material and asking smart questions. I asked him, "Why are you guys here?"

He said, "Oh, this is our in-service training for the year."

I said, incredulously, "For the year???"

"Yep.  There's not a big training budget"

"Who's minding the store?"

He said that this was only about one third of the audit staff.

Now think about this...

The price of this class was $200 per person. Even if they got a deal from the seminar company I was working for, they probably still paid $7000 or $8000 for those 50 people.  And they were only a third of the staff.

For that same price, they could have had someone do a custom seminar for their entire audit staff, not just one third of them. Instead they got a seminar not designed for them, but for businesses and taxpayers.  And this one day general seminar was their only training for the entire year!!!

So there are two take-aways from this:

1. The auditors in your state may not be getting the training they need, so you should not assume they're always right.

2. The training department for your department of revenue may not be spending your money wisely.

Please keep in mind there are are lots of good, knowledgeable, and competent sales tax auditors out there. I have met quite a few. If you get one of these folks, your audit will be professionally conducted by a sharp representative of the state.

But there are a lot of dolts out there too. Particularly in East Dakota.  I mean, they named their capital Snagglepuss!

By the way, other than the made up geographical names (which I'm having fun with), this is an absolutely true story.




The Sales Tax Guy
http://salestaxguy.blogspot.com

See the disclaimer - this is for education only.  Research these issues thoroughly before making decisions.  Remember: there are details we haven't discussed, and every state is different.  Here's more information

Get these articles in your inbox - subscribe at http://salestaxguy.blogspot.com

Don't forget our upcoming seminars and webinars.
http://www.salestax-usetax.com/
Picture note: the image above is hosted on Flickr. If you'd like to see more, click on the photo. 

Monday, January 31, 2011

FAQ: What if I underpay my taxes?

This question came in over the weekend and I just answered it. I've sanitized it, because it's worth mentioning to those of you who are relatively uninformed about this:

Found your Sales Tax Guy blog while doing some research. I'm hoping you can answer a question for me.

I own a small retail store in New Jersey. I recently discovered that my now former accountant was underpaying the amount of sales tax I owe. We collect the correct amount (8.75%) but it looks like we have been sending about 7.75% to the state every month for the last three years!

Should I just forget about the past shortages (we're paying the correct amount now) and hope that the state doesn't discover the error? How could the state discover the error anyway unless I brought it to their attention?


Doreen, of all of the possible mistakes that you can make, this is dang near the top of the "really bad" list. Have a look these articles.

You need to get professional help from someone who knows their way around sales and use tax. It'll be expensive but not as expensive as the price you'll pay if you ignore this. And New Jersey is broke, so they're even more aggressive about finding unpaid taxes.

They'll find you. It's called a "sales tax audit." And this particularly problem is one they'll probably find in the first hour or so of the audit. Snap.

Find some help.

Jim

This also brings up an issue I've talked about before. While your accountant may be highly knowledgeable at income taxes, there's a good chance that he or she knows virtually nothing about sales and use taxes. But the eventual responsibility will rest with you. So make sure that whoever you take advice from on this topic actually knows something about it. And make sure they're doing it right.

Jim


The Sales Tax Guy
http://salestaxguy.blogspot.com

See the disclaimer - this is for education only. Research these issues thoroughly before making decisions. Remember: there are details we haven't discussed, and every state is different. Here's more information

Get these articles in your inbox - subscribe at http://salestaxguy.blogspot.com

Don't forget our upcoming seminars and webinars.
http://www.salestax-usetax.com/


Thursday, August 05, 2010

Another Reason Not to Call the State

Our crack customer service team awaits your callI've talked about why you want to avoid calling the state with any sales and use tax questions. I've now got another reason. I was talking with a woman in a seminar earlier this month and she told me this story that should make you even more suspicious.

She worked for a hospital and had called the state to find out about the taxability of a particular item. She started describing the situation which involved an item being shipped from Michigan to her state, and how she worked for a hospital, and how....

The state employee immediately told her it was not taxable and essentially hung up.

The woman came to the class convinced that anything shipped to her state from out of state wasn't taxable - because that was the question she had intended to ask. I spent some time deprogramming her with the message that it's the delivery state that counts, not the ship-from state. It doesn't matter that it was shipped from another state. In other words, the answer she got from the state representative was completely wrong. And for the wrong reason!

We talked more and I realized what happened. As she was explaining the situation to the person on the phone at the state, she mentioned hospital. Well, that gave the headphone wearer all the information she needed. It was a purchase by a hospital! Hospitals are exempt*. The answer is the purchase wasn't taxable. Yay!

If the state employee had listened longer and asked more, she would have found out that the hospital was buying this item for one of their for-profit subsidiaries which was taxable.

In most telephone-bank jobs, particularly the ones where they don't care about customer service, employees are evaluated on how quickly they can close a call and move on to the next one. They're not rewarded for patience or even giving the right answer. So this operator heard "hospital" and she had an answer. Done! Move on to the next call.

So when you're talking to the state on the phone, in addition to all of the other reasons why you shouldn't rely on their answer, you also have to make sure they don't prematurely give you the answer before they've even gotten all of the information.

Remember, if you have to contact the state, try to email them. At least you're not dealing with the state employee's needing to get you off the phone fast.

*Another problem is that not all hospitals are exempt. There are for-profit hospitals that would be just as taxable as anyone else. It's not super-relevant to the story, but I wanted to forestall someone pointing this out. ;-)



The Sales Tax Guy
http://salestaxguy.blogspot.com

See the disclaimer - this is for education only. Research these issues thoroughly before making decisions. Remember: there are details we haven't discussed, and every state is different. Here's more information

Get these articles in your inbox - subscribe at http://salestaxguy.blogspot.com

Here's information on our upcoming seminars and webinars.
http://www.salestax-usetax.com/

Picture note: the image above is hosted on Flickr. If you'd like to see more, click on the photo.

Monday, December 28, 2009

Illustrations and Parables: The Generator

I was doing a seminar in Mobile, Alabama when I picked this one up.

Background

Mobile, if you don't regularly watch the Weather Channel, probably gets more than their share of hurricanes. This particular company had a plant in the area. They were far enough back from the beach to not have a problem with water or storm surges, but they were still subject to wind damage. And the biggest problem was power outages that apparently could last for more than a week. So they bought a big, honkin' generator to provide backup power.

However, they didn't keep the generator at the plant. It was an outside generator and they didn't want to worry about wind damage. They stored it in Houston, Texas at the facility of the dealer who sold them the generator. You see, the hurricane that would tear up Mobile, is not going to be the hurricane that goes through Houston. This is the ultimate in "off site" backup.

The Plan

After the storm passes through, they'll call up the dealer and tell him to deliver the generator. That would probably take a day or so. In the meantime, they'll clean up the site and do any other preparatory work necessary.

The generator arrives, they set it up, and voilà, power! They can start making stuff, shipping to their customers, and providing employees with a much needed paycheck.

The Problem

The state of Texas audited the dealership and noticed the generator (probably more than one - storing these things is probably a nice little side business for them). After finding out who owned it, Texas went after the company in Alabama asserting that they had nexus in Texas. After all, they did have a pretty big and expensive piece of equipment sitting in Texas. Which means they have a physical presence in Texas. Right?

The company believed the auditor and paid their back taxes, penalties and interest and registered in Texas.

Duh?

I asked the guy who was telling me this story, "And you believed the auditor?"

"Well, yeah. He's the auditor, he knows what he's talking about."

"Do you have any other physical presence in the state? And I reeled off the various factors."

"No. Just the generator," he said, starting to feel nervous.

I said, "You really need to get yourself a lawyer who knows their way around Texas nexus issues. I can't believe that generator gives you nexus in Texas. It's just one piece of equipment that has nothing to do with exploiting the Texas marketplace. It's merely being stored in Texas because that's where the dealer happens to be. I'll bet a lawyer would be able to beat this easily"

"But the auditor said..." I think I ruined his day.

Folks, please remember that the auditor is likely to be telling you stuff she learned about in a meeting back at the office. She's not a lawyer, and she has not reviewed the court cases herself. She's just trying to pry some tax revenue out of you. Never take the auditor's word for it. Get yourself a lawyer or CPA who is an expert at sales and use taxes. They'll be expensive, but they'll know a whole lot more than that sales tax auditor. And they'll be on your side.

This company threw money away in the direction of Texas because they didn't understand the way nexus worked, and they believed the auditor. Don't do it!

The Sales Tax Guy
http://salestaxguy.blogspot.com

See disclaimer and research the issues thoroughly before making decisions

Here's information on our upcoming seminars and webinars

Picture note: the picture above is hosted on Flickr. If you'd like to see more, click on the picture.

Tuesday, November 03, 2009

Illustrations and Parables - The Story of the Fizzy Turkey

A guy in the class worked for a poultry processor. The auditor busted them on the carbon dioxide gas that they injected into the meat. The company had always assumed that this gas was exempt from sales tax because it was an ingredient. Ingredients are almost always exempt.

"Sounds good to me," I said. "But why do you inject carbon dioxide into the meat?" All I could think of was fizzy turkey.

The guy said, "I don't know, I work in accounts payable." I kid you not. Absolutely true.

This is one of my favorite stories, frankly because the AP piece is the funny part. When I told it in a different seminar, another poultry processor told me that the CO2 is a preservative. And, since it's the stuff that gives your Coke the bubbles, it's gotta be safe.

Anyway, the auditor said it didn't qualify for the exemption, and they were nicked for the sales tax. The amount was BIG - the assessment hurt. Now, the carbon dioxide IS an ingredient in the meat. They inject it into the chicken. So why was it taxable?

The auditor said that, in order for the CO2 to be considered an ingredient, it must be present in the final product when opened by the final consumer. And by the time you take your chicken home from the store, and open up the package, the carbon dioxide is gone. So, according to the auditor, it's not an ingredient - it's taxable.

But is the auditor right? I looked at the statute and the regulations after the seminar. There is no restriction, in that particular state's laws, saying the the ingredient must be present in the final product when opened by the consumer.

Some states do require that the ingredient be in the product sold at retail. To me, this means the CO2 must be there when the customer picks up the package from the cooler. And other states merely say that the ingredient must be in the final product, not specifying the point in time. Which could mean when the product is packaged and moved to the shipping department. But I've seen no state that specifies that the ingredient must be there when the customer opens the package.

Since the law, in this state, didn't even specify that the ingredient must be present when sold at retail, the taxpayer could have fought it. The assessment was big enough to make it worthwhile to hire some expensive professionals to appeal. But the taxpayer made the big mistake: he assumed the auditor was correct. He didn't even ask to see the law. He just wrote the check to the state.

So the morals of this particular parable are:

1. Know the rules for what qualifies as an ingredient in your state and adjust your procedures accordingly,
2. Have a better understanding of your processes, even if you work in accounts payable,
and most importantly,
3. Never assume that the auditor is right. Make them prove it!

Sales Tax Guy

See disclaimer and research the issues thoroughly before making decisions

Here's information on our upcoming seminars and webinars And we do coaching!

And please don't forget to visit our advertisers!

Picture note: the picture above is hosted on Flickr and is pretty funny. If you'd like to see more, click on the picture.

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

If you insist on contacting the state...

...do it by email. As mentioned previously, don't call. But you can at least get a slightly more reliable response from them if you ask them via email. Then the response will be an email. Which means you at least have something to show the auditor that corroborates your position.

There are a couple of issues.

1. It still may be the wrong answer. And to cover themselves, it's a good bet that there will be a disclaimer at the bottom of the email saying, essentially, "We might be wrong. Don't take our word for it."

To deal with that, when you ask your question, ask for a link to where you can read more about it. Don't take the answer you are given without some support.

2. If you email them a question, they now know who you are. I mean, you gave them your email, didn't you? Set up a Yahoo or Google mail account, or use your personal email account. Use some email address that won't enable the state to track you back to your company.

"Ha," you're saying, "the state would never do that." Yes they would. I've had several people over the years who got audited suspiciously soon after they had asked a question. And the audit centered on the exact area the question was about. And I had one auditor in the class (I hate it when they show up, but they always provide interesting information) who did, in fact, cop to the fact that they audited people based on questions they asked.

3. You may be dealing with a state who has not, as of yet, heard of email. You'll be forced to use the phone. Or find some better way of getting your answers.

Sales Tax Guy

See disclaimer

Here's information on our upcoming seminars and webinars

And please don't forget to visit our advertisers!

Picture note: the picture above is hosted on Flickr. If you'd like to see a larger version, click on the picture, then click on the "all sizes" button above the picture.

Saturday, August 16, 2008

Don’t Trust Auditors


First of all, in the event that there are any auditors reading this, there are good people doing this job, including you. I’ve met a few. In fact, when I actually was an accountant, I’ve been lucky enough to have mostly good auditors. There was that time when one of them had to keep leaving early to testify before a grand jury. But that’s another story.

Most of what I talk about here are stories and examples that I’ve heard from people in my seminars, or from actual conversations with auditors. I think that most of you who are reading this, who are auditors, would agree with me. You shouldn’t be the only source of information for your victims. That’s the point of this article. Taxpayers shouldn’t trust auditors for these reasons:

1. Auditors are not necessarily well-educated accountants.

They may not even have a degree in accounting! I had one guy in my class who described an audit where he had to spend an entire afternoon with an auditor explaining depreciation to him. Now I learned about depreciation in freshman year in college. I’ll admit I had some problems with sum-of-years-digits, but I got straight-line pretty fast. If you have to teach an auditor about depreciation, do you really want to rely on him for tax information?

The state revenue department doesn’t get the top graduates either. They go on to jobs with large companies, CPA firms, graduate school, etc. The rest of the business world and the IRS gets most of the rest of the good folks. Let’s put it a different way…I know of no one who got a degree in accounting, with high honors, who skipped the recruiting fair and went directly to work for the state revenue department.

Keep in mind, for the most part, a front-line auditor’s job consists of looking at invoices all day, working in miserable spaces, surrounded by people who hate you. Not a great way to attract the best talent.

2. They usually receive bad training.

A couple of years ago, I had a group of auditors in my seminar. When I asked them at the break why they were in the meeting, they said that it was their in-service training for the entire year! One 6 hour seminar, that is at a general, introductory/intermediate level, was their training for the entire year? And this was not a small, backwater place either. But frankly, from the looks on their faces, and the questions they were asking, an introductory seminar probably was the right place for them to be.

A former auditor was in my class recently who described her new-hire training as an auditor. On the first day, after she had taken care of the paperwork, etc., her boss handed her the state audit manual and said, “Read this. You’re going out on your first auditor tomorrow. Solo.” So, after half a day of reading a manual, this recent accounting graduate was out there auditing companies, putting them threw hell, giving them bad information, etc. And all because the state only did training for new recruits every quarter.

There are some states that take auditor training seriously. I get the sense that most don’t.

So don’t assume your auditor even knows the law. At best, if they paid attention in class, they know what the trainer wants them to know. And trust me, they don’t memorize the statues and regulations.

3. They’re job is to get money.

Given that you’re dealing with auditors who are not necessarily well educated, and haven’t been well trained, the capper is that they’re told to go out and get money. So they will do what they can. Which means they will interpret the law badly, possibly not even follow the law, or maybe even intentionally bluff you. And I’ve heard lots of stories about all of these situations.

What can you do?

Don’t trust them! Make them show you where the law says you have to do it this way. If it’s the law, it’s written down. If they say, “well, that’s how we do things,” then you’ve got some room to maneuver. I call that an undocumented enforcement policy. It isn’t the law. Although a badly trained auditor may think it’s the law.

To me, the best way of keeping an auditor in line is to have a sales and use tax expert (not a generic lawyer or accountant) in on the meetings. This way they know that you’ve got someone in your corner who knows more than they do. They’ll be more careful, and they will be less inclined to bluff. And if you can’t afford your own expert, then make sure the auditor knows that you’re not going to be a pushover. Research these issues as they come up using whatever resources your boss will spring for. But make sure the auditor knows you intend to be smarter than them.

Sales Tax Guy

And again, apologies to all those good auditors out there.

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Don't Trust Tables

I've mentioned this before but it bares repeating since the question just came up today.

Don't trust information presented in tabular form or in lists. I was chatting with a woman today, and she was clutching an old publication her company used to answer sales and use tax questions. She really relied on this publication but she recognized that it was a little out of date. She was looking for something to replace it. There were a couple of pages of text and then tables showing the various exemptions... maybe five pages for each state. As I glanced through it, I could spot quite a few situations where the one word answer was just not enough.

The problem is that we like tables because they're simpler. Answers are distilled down to a nice, neat matrix and we get some very short answers that fill in the little boxes. Unfortunately, most of the answers are NOT short and NOT simple. So when we rely on lists and tables, we're NOT getting the whole answer. In sales and use taxes, we simply need longer answers. We need paragraphs!

Tables may be OK for simple issues like rates, but beware of tables and lists for more complicated topics. Always assume it's more complicated.



The Sales Tax Guy
http://salestaxguy.blogspot.com

See the disclaimer - this is for education only. Research these issues thoroughly before making decisions.

Here's information on our upcoming seminars and webinars.
http://www.salestax-usetax.com/

Wednesday, September 05, 2007

Beware of Bad Advice

A seminar participant in Alabama (I’m lying – it wasn’t Alabama) called the Department of Revenue. She was told, “Your Alabama resale certificate will work in all the states.”

Well, sometimes it does and sometimes it doesn’t. For example, if you’re in Alabama, and go and pick up goods at your vendor’s dock in some other state, they’ll probably accept your Alabama resale certificate. But they will probably also require you to fill out a form making clear that you are buying the goods for resale, and you are taking them out of state without use, AND that you won’t be selling it right back into the state where you’re picking it up.

And, of course, an Alabama certificate will work when the shipment is sent to Alabama.

But it won’t work in states that have, what I call, the Nutty Drop Ship Law.

There are two morals to the story

1. Getting phone advice from the state is always risky;
2. Be VERY careful about accepting the advice of a state when it comes to the rules in other states. Frankly, many of them barely know their OWN state laws and have no business telling you what the rules are in other states.

Sales Tax Guy

Sunday, November 19, 2006

The Worst Source of Information


When I rank information sources in my seminar, this one is the lowest on the list...

"We've always done it this way."

Or variation number 1:

"They told me to do it this way."

Or variation number 2:

"My predecessor told me to do it this way."

The most amazing example of this came up this week when a woman in the seminar told me their method for determining the taxability of their purchases (they've always done it this way):

If the vendor charges freight, the purchase is taxable. If the vendor didn't charge freight, then the purchase isn't taxable.

Sigh.

Sales Tax Guy

Tuesday, June 14, 2005

Another example of a bad information source

A seminar participant recently mentioned that her controller said he had called the state a couple of years ago and they said a particular item was taxable.

Oh, there are so many things wrong with this!

1. Controllers aren't necessary experts at sales and use tax.
2. CALLED the state? If you're going to contact them, email them so you get the answer in writing and get some supporting information.
3. It was a couple of years ago!
4. What do you think the state is GOING to say?

Sales Tax Guy

See disclaimer

Here's information on our upcoming seminars and webinars

And please don't forget to visit our advertisers!