Monday, November 30, 2009

Quick Tip: Non-Profits

Hey, just because you're a non-profit doesn't mean you're exempt from sales and use taxes. Yeah, that's right, I mean you. Your purchases might be taxable. And your sales are probably taxable. Read more here.

Sales Tax Guy

Here's information on our upcoming seminars and webinars

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Documentation when you ship out of state

Once upon a time, there was a jeweler who got audited. He was questioned on a whole bunch of sales that he hadn't charged sales tax on. The jeweler claimed that he shipped those items out of state. He pointed out, to the auditor, that the ship-to addresses were in different states, and that he had charged the customer for the shipping charges.

The auditor then asked the jeweler for actual proof that he had shipped the goods, as opposed to the more likely situation where the customer was in the store and arranged to have the items "shipped" with a minor freight charge.

The jeweler came up with the Fed Ex bills of lading.

The auditor then asked to see the actual invoices from Fed Ex, or the tracking reports.

The jeweler couldn't seem to find those records.

The jeweler had to go to bed without his supper.

Remember, the delivery point defines that state that gets to make the rules and gets the taxes. If the delivery is in the store at the counter, then obviously the state where the store is located gets the taxes.

A common scam is for dealers of expensive, but cheap-to-ship consumer goods to "ship" the goods and then just hand them to the customer in order to evade the sales tax. Sharp auditors simply ask for proof that the items actually were shipped. And Fed Ex bills of lading aren't enough. There's no signature, no stamp, no evidence at all on the typical form that the goods have even been touched by Fed Ex. The scam could simply involve preparing the Fed Ex bill of lading, and attaching it to the sales paperwork. And I wouldn't be surprised if that's pretty much what happened in this case. But as we've seen, that's not enough. You need proof.

Whenever you ship taxable goods out of state, the auditor will (hopefully) realize that they don't get to tax that shipment, assuming the seller shipped it out of state. You need to maintain adequate records to prove that:
  • Invoices from the freight carrier
  • Tracking logs
  • Signed bills of lading
  • Export paperwork
The standard Fed Ex form isn't enough.

A seminar participant once incredulously asked, "you mean I have to attach all that stuff to every invoice in my files?" My answer was that, no she didn't. But she should have an audit trail to be able to get to that paperwork, if the auditor needs to see it.

Remember, the auditor needs proof. Which isn't an unreasonable request considering the amount of potential taxes to be evaded using this scam.

Note, I'm aware of a further evasion that is almost foolproof. I'm not going to mention it here, because it is pretty sneaky and hard for the state to catch. Which is why I'll pass on mentioning it. But the truly nefarious among you have probably already figured it out.

This blog will be silent for the rest of the week. Have a good Thanksgiving.

Sales Tax Guy

See disclaimer and research the issues thoroughly before making decisions

Here's information on our upcoming seminars and webinars

Picture note: the picture above is hosted on Flickr. If you'd like to see more, click on the picture.

obg

Monday, November 23, 2009

Sales and Use Tax News

These are gleanings from newsletters, etc. I have not included all of the events, nor have I provided much detail. As usual, the disclaimer applies - check this kind of thing out yourself. I just want to give you a heads-up.

Medical marijuana is taxable in Colorado. It's not sold by prescription, and it doesn't meet the tests for any other exemptions. Attorney General Opinion, 09-06 , 11/16/2009

South Carolina has a gun sales tax holiday coming up this weekend. thetandd.com and South Carolina Department of Revenue, News Release, 11/02/2009. Also, temporary storage of property in the state is exempt from use tax if destined for use solely out of state . South Carolina Revenue Ruling 09-17, 11/19/2009

Check verification services are not considered taxable data processing services in New York. In the Matter of the Petition of TeleCheck Services, Inc., Division of Tax Appeals, ALJ, Dkt. No. 822275, 11/05/2009.

In Vermont, meals sold by schools, as well as the usual housing provided to students are exempt Vermont Technical Bulletin TB-48, 11/02/2009

In Maryland, receipts for sales of tickets from college games are not taxable if the receipts are used exclusively for educational purposes. Maryland Sales Use Tax Bulletin 1-10, 11/17/2009

Rate Increases

Local

New Mexico
Alabama
Illinois
New York
South Dakota

State

District of Columbia

with a rate change recap here.

Sales Tax Guy

See disclaimer and research the issues thoroughly before making decisions

Here's information on our upcoming seminars and webinars And we do coaching!

And please don't forget to visit our advertisers!

Picture note: the picture above is hosted on Flickr. If you'd like to see more, click on the picture.






Friday, November 20, 2009

Admissions

One of the commonly taxed services is admissions. Many states don't tax these, and others do. And the ones that do have a wide variety of approaches:

Admissions to entertainment events as a spectator: movies, concerts, baseball games, culture, music festivals, etc. If you pay money to get in, and it's entertaining (or it's supposed to be entertaining) then it might be taxed.

Admissions to training activities: in other words, events that aren't supposed to be entertaining at all. This type of tax is much rarer. But it's there in a few states.This is why you'll never see TakeChargeSeminars.com doing a seminar in Connecticut. I just don't want to have to collect sales tax on the seminar fees that Connecticut imposes. Sorry CT folks.

Charges for participation: greens fees at the golf course, charges to participate in a marathon, health club fees, etc. These are not quite as commonly taxed as admissions charges for spectators, but they are taxed.

Club memberships: health club memberships, as well as country clubs and golf clubs. These types of organizations may not have fees for individual activities, but the purpose of the membership fee is to buy access and more or less unlimited activity. And country club folks are wealthier, so they're easier targets. ;-)

There are exemptions too.

Amazingly enough, most states that have had a Superbowl, or want to have a Superbowl, will also have an exemption for Superbowl admissions, assuming there was a tax in the first place.

Non-profit organizations are often off the hook for charging tax on their tickets for school plays and concerts, festivals and carnivals, etc.

Ditto for sales of admissions by government agencies, particularly schools and universities, and government owned stadiums.

And there are catches

For example, there was a case, years ago, when a music festival was selling admission tickets which included two beverages. The admission itself wasn't taxable in this particular state because it was being sold by a non-profit organization, but the state argued that the beverages included in the price should have been taxed (even when sold by a non-profit). Since the price of the beverages wasn't separately stated and taxed on the ticket, the state nicked this non-profit music festival for sales tax on the entire admission fee (this is an example of the bundling rule). The assessment was over $100, 000 in taxes, interest and penalties.

Sales Tax Guy

See disclaimer and research the issues thoroughly before making decisions

Here's information on our upcoming seminars and webinars And we do coaching!

And please don't forget to visit our advertisers!

Picture note: the picture above is hosted on Flickr. If you'd like to see more, click on the picture.





Wednesday, November 18, 2009

Rate Changes

Rate changes happen all the time. I have started mentioning them in my news postings, but I can't foresee sending a lot of time on the topic. They change. Mostly they go up because your politicians can't figure out any other way to cover budget gaps, etc. I can think of some ways. You can think of some ways. They can't (scratching head). So rate increases happen.

The problem comes into play when a sale "crosses" the rate increase. It works this way:

April 1 The contract is written and signed (the rate is 6%)
April 5 Politicians pass a rate increase of 2%
April 15 The 2 % rate increase happens
May 20 The delivery is made (the new rate is 8%)

What rate does the sale get taxed at? If everyone is operating under the assumption that the rate is 6%, and then the rate turns out to be 8%, that's a problem.

Budgets get screwed up. Lawaways get confused. Arguments about who gets to pay the extra 2% happen. Purchasing decisions may have been different if the rate were the higher 8%.

This is particularly a problem in situations where the seller consumes materials to fulfill on the sale. They can't pass the rate increase on because they consumed the materials (contractors are a good example). They would have bid the project higher if they had known about the additional rate (and cost). Now they have to eat that 2% and that's not fair.

There is no one answer to this problem. But it's been my experience that every time there is a rate increase, states provide a transition rule of some sort. So the answer is to have a look at your state's laws, bulletins and regulations. Very often the procedure is right in the announcement of the rate increase. So you shouldn't have to look very deeply.

There is very likely to be something that discusses the problem and gives you some loopholes.

And thanks to Pamela for asking the question.

Sales Tax Guy

See disclaimer and research the issues thoroughly before making decisions

Here's information on our upcoming seminars and webinars And we do coaching!

And please don't forget to visit our advertisers!

Monday, November 16, 2009

Sales and Use Tax News

These are gleanings from newsletters, etc. I have not included all of the events, nor have I provided much detail. As usual, the disclaimer applies - check this kind of thing out yourself. I just want to give you a heads-up.

In New York, The sales and use tax exemption for tangible personal property purchased to maintain, service, and repair an aircraft has been extended indefinitely.
New York Technical Service Bureau Memorandum TSB-M-09(18)S, 11/05/2009

Louisiana issued rules regarding the phase in of the exclusion of manufacturing consumables from taxes over the next couple of years.
Louisiana Revenue Information Bulletin 09-050, 11/09/2009

They've also provided additional information on the provisions of the Cajun Dome excemption.
Louisiana Revenue Information Bulletin 09-051, 11/09/2009

In North Carolina, tire recappers get some exemptions
17 NCAC § 7B.1905, effective 10/01/2009

State rate changes in North Carolina related to fuels other than electricity, prefabricated buildings, commercial printers and publishers,

And broadcasting equipment, movie production equipment and mill machinery to contractors and subcontractors now exempt in North Carolina

In Texas, Full-time federal employees of the Texas National Guard traveling on official business may claim exemption from state and local hotel occupancy tax
Texas Policy Letter Ruling 200911472L, 11/06/2009

Local rate changes

Alabama
Georgia
Mississippi
Washington

Sales Tax Guy

See disclaimer and research the issues thoroughly before making decisions

Here's information on our upcoming seminars and webinars And we do coaching!

And please don't forget to visit our advertisers!

Picture note: the picture above is hosted on Flickr. If you'd like to see more, click on the picture.

Thursday, November 12, 2009

Illustrations and Parables: The Mystery of the Missing Texas Taxes

I was doing only my second seminar EVER on sales and use taxes. It was Manhattan and this woman comes up to me at the first break. I had talked about personal liability of officers in the previous section and she looked worried.

"Hi, I just started as the CFO for a company here in New York, and I found out that we've been selling a lot of stuff to a company in Texas for years, and charging them sales tax. But we haven't been filing Texas sales tax returns."

"Well, that's not the end of the world," I said. "Mistakes happen. I assume you have been remitting that money to the state of New York?" That's typically the way it works. Many people make the error of charging tax for deliveries in a remote state, but report those sales on their local return. Nobody's going to jail for that. Penalties and back taxes, yes. Striped pajamas? No.

"Well, actually, we haven't paid the taxes to anyone," she said. "That's how I found the problem. I was going through the general ledger and came across this account for Texas Sales Taxes Due."

"How much is in there?"

"One hundred and fifty-three thousand dollars."

My wife tells me I don't hide my emotions well. I must not have in this situation because she asked me, "Is this bad?"

"OK, let me make sure I understand this. Your employer has been shipping stuff to a company in Texas for a long time?"

"Yes, about eleven years."

"And they have been charging Texas taxes. And showing this on the invoices?

She nodded, "Yes, I looked at some of the recent invoices and they show 'sales tax' right on the invoice. It looks like the Texas rate too."

"Are they still doing this? Making sales to Texas, charging tax and letting it sit in that liability account?"

"Yes."

"Just out of curiosity, is this a small, entrepreneurial company where the owners have put pretty much everything into the business?"

"Yes."

"Hundred and fifty thousand?"

"Yep."

"And you haven't paid this money to Texas, or even New York, right?"

"Right." I really do remember this conversation like it was yesterday. It's firmly planted in my brain.

"OK. Final question. Are you really the CFO or is that just the title they gave you?" This happens, folks. They might have given her the CFO title, but not actually make her an officer of the company. I once was a "sort-of" CFO.

"Yes, in fact we just took care of the paperwork last week."

I took a deep breath. "Mary," her name was Mary, did I mention that? "You should probably leave the seminar now. You've learned enough for the day. I'd strongly recommend that you get this resolved, and you should talk to your own attorney. You're an officer of the company. Even though you weren't around when all of this happened, the longer you're on board, knowing what's still going on, the more likely you're going to be in deep trouble. You may wind up holding the bag."

The problems are:

1. The customer gets audited by Texas who discovers that they've paid all this tax to a company who wasn't registered in Texas. Texas makes the customer pay the money all over again, plus interest and taxes. The customer probably has a good case for fraud against Mary's company. They charged them tax and didn't remit it to any state. For eleven years!

2. Texas may decide to go after Mary's company, particularly if they had nexus in Texas. I didn't ask Mary about Nexus.

I've read more than a couple of stories where, in a start-up situation, the owners put their life-savings into the business, and then some. When the business fails, they've got nothing to make good on debts - like a sales tax liability in Texas.

But the CFO probably doesn't have any skin in the game. And Mary has some money. She's got a house, car, maybe a vacation home, and a 401k that carried over from another company. And she's an officer of the company. She really might be the only one left with any money when the dust settles after this company goes out of business. There have been cases...

As she left, I was really hoping she'd talk to a lawyer.

She emailed me a few days later.

Hi, Jim,

I quit the job.
I went in to my boss' office the next day and said, "we really need to talk about this Texas tax liability." He said, "Mary, it would be a really good idea if you never brought this up again. Ever." I realized that I didn't want to work there anymore. I figured if he had a problem with just one thing like that, what else was lurking? And as the CFO, I didn't want to be associated with that kind of business.

Thanks,
Mary

The moral of the story? There are two.

First of all, sales tax seminars can be more interesting than you'd think.

Secondly, if you're an officer of the company, you have some serious liability for your company's "mistakes," whether it's sales tax, payroll taxes or some other problem. Beware.

By the way, a couple of years later, I was chatting with an executive with the audit division at the Texas revenue department. I told him the story. After shaking his head, he asked hopefully, "You don't happen to know the name of either of those companies, do you?"

"Nope," I smiled. "My seminars are kind of like confession. What's said in the seminar, stays in the seminar."

And if you're wondering, the dialogue and facts are as true as I can remember. But the states, cities and Mary's name were all changed to protect the extremely guilty.


Sales Tax Guy

See disclaimer and research the issues thoroughly before making decisions

Here's information on our upcoming seminars and webinars And we do coaching!

And please don't forget to visit our advertisers!

Picture note: the picture above is hosted on Flickr. If you'd like to see more, click on the picture.