Thursday, June 07, 2007

Check transaction taxability

The major risk that companies have is not paying use tax on their untaxed purchases. And we discuss this problem in the seminars. BUT, it's also important to NOT pay taxes when you don't have to. For example, I had a participant from Illinois recently tell me this story.

They bought services from a company that was also in Illinois. Because the vendor didn't charge sales tax, the AP department self-assessed use tax. Apparently, nobody asked whether or not this service was taxable (in many states it is). But in Illinois this service isn't taxable. If the AP department had simply asked the vendor why they weren't charging tax, they might have avoided paying taxes they didn't need to pay.

But nobody asked. And they self assessed use tax on these purchases for years.

Finally, someone asked a question about the invoice and a purchasing agent, who had been in my seminar, happened to notice that they were self-assessing use tax. She emailed me asking whether or not I thought this invoice was taxable. I replied that I couldn't imagine how it could be. She researched it further and discovered that they had OVERPAID the state of Illinois by almost $19,000!

The morals of the story:
1. Check the taxability of every transaction, particularly large or continuing ones;
2. When you have an in-state vendor who isn't charging tax, they might know why. Before you go self-assessing, ask them.
3. One of the reasons this mistake may have been made is because the person deciding on taxability may have been most familiar with another state and just assumed Illinois would be the same. Make sure your staff knows that the state rules vary from state to state. Assume nothing is the same.

The Sales Tax Guy

Wednesday, June 06, 2007

Issue: Product Testing - Exempt?

I had a call today from a seminar participant and as we were talking, I realized her issue would be a perfect puzzle to present to you.

The company makes engines. The engines are taken out of finished goods inventory and placed in a testing area. Are the testing equipment and supplies taxable or exempt under the manufacturing equipment exemption? In most states, inline testing of manufactured products would be exempt as part of the manufacturing process. But in this state, the manufacturing process stops once the product has been put in finished goods inventory (in most states, the process stops at the last machine).

So testing the engine, after it's been placed in inventory, would be outside the scope of manufacturing and therefore taxable. But here's the fun part: if they had intercepted the engines before being placed in the warehouse, then the testing would have fallen within the scope of manufacturing and would therefore be exempt. Stupid, huh?

In my conversation with the taxpayer, I suggested she contact a local expert. While a strict reading of the laws is all I can go with, a local consultant (CPA, lawyer, etc.) will be familiar with enforcement practices in that state. I can foresee an undocumented position of, "well, yeah, we know this is really inline quality control testing; it's just getting placed in the warehouse for convenience and you haven't made the journal entry moving it to FG inventory, so we'll let this one slide." It isn't documented (as near as I can tell), but it may be the informal position the state takes.

There are three lessons here:

1. understand the rules for the exemptions that your company takes advantage of;
2. interpret the rules very strictly;
3. engage a local expert to identify any undocumented positions that will help you.

The Sales Tax Guy

Thursday, May 31, 2007

Are there any questions?

I'm actually don't bring my tank to seminars. Just so you all know.

A little sales tax humor, folks.

Sales Tax Guy

Saturday, May 26, 2007

The Marshmellow Rule

I enjoy finding interesting and strange laws as I travel the country doing sales and use tax seminars. I discovered one in New York. They consider grocery store type food to be non-taxable. But as in many states, candy is considered taxable.

So what to do about marshmellows? You and I might not think this would be a big deal, but evidently the regulators in Albany felt the need to address this burning issue.

Miniature marshmellows are exempt as food. The big ones are taxable.

But a seminar participant last week brought up a good point: what about marshmellow fluff?

UPDATE: All marshmellows are now exempt in NY.

Friday, April 27, 2007

Days numbered for tax-free Net sales (CNET article)

While they don't get some of the important concepts regarding sales and use taxes, this article illustrates an important point that I missed. With a Democratic Congress, there is a higher likelihood that Quill will be overturned to some extent and the Streamlined Sales Tax Project will become more relevent. Worth a read.

Friday, April 06, 2007

Banks Owe Sales and Use Tax

Banks often get caught for SUT in a couple of areas:

1. The first is the obvious failure to pay their use taxes. Since they often don't file SUT returns, they don't realize they have this liability. This same problem exists for other organizations, particularly professional services firms, that don't sell taxable stuff or services (or don't realize they're making taxable sales).

2. Banks often sell stuff, which is taxable. A few things that come to mind include: checks, credit card swiping machines, rental of safe deposit boxes (taxable in some states), deposit bags, software, meeting room rental (taxable in some states), numismatic items, etc.

I call this gotcha the "non-core sales" problem. Companies that don't make taxable sales in their normal activities might still be exposed in other areas.

Beware

Sales Tax Guy

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Did an Auditor Find Something?

I had someone from one of my seminars just send me a list of about 10 things that an auditor had busted them on. They wanted me to review the list and identify the taxability of each item. Here are the problems with asking me to do this:

1. The list was long. At some point in time, free questions turn into consulting engagements. And as I've said before, you need a local person for that.

2. The issues were edited down to a couple of words. Asking me to rule on them, when the auditor may have seen more that me is not a good thing. And I don't want to get into a contest with an auditor unless I see everything they see.

3. Why should I (or you) do the work? If an auditor says something is taxable, and you're not convinced, ask them to show you the law, bulletin, statute, regulation, opinion letter, or some other citation. Don't be confrontational, just tell them that, before you pay any money, management is gonna want to see where it says it's taxable - in black and white.

4. Shouldn't your CPA have been involved by now? Granted they may not know more than you do, but how do you expect them to learn if you don't get them involved? And they can do the research for you (and therefore learn).

Sales Tax Guy